Saturday, March 2, 2019

"Italy: The Gift of Art" - March 3, 2019




Luke 9:28-36


            One of my favorite professors in college was Dr. Gerald Fitzgerald, who introduced himself to his freshman classes, “I’m a poet who teaches to support my habit.”  He had the thickest South Boston accent I’ve ever heard, which I won’t try to reproduce, but after he introduced himself, he asked us, “Why is there poetry?” to which, of course, everyone responded with blank stares and a feeling that we might have signed up for a required course with a lunatic.  After a few seconds of silence, he said, “Okay, then.  How many days are there in April?” 

            Now, I know you’re doing what we did.  You’re saying to yourself, “Thirty days hath September, April, June, and November.”  Poetry is one of the ways we remember.  Dr. Fitzgerald went on from there to say that poetry is also one of the ways we teach and learn, not only about set facts but also about what it is to be a human being alive within the natural world and living among other human beings and with questions about what other world may lie beyond this one.

            Psychology, anthropology, sociology, biology, even theology are all mind-centered and rational ways of doing the same thing, but the arts are not just helpful, but even necessary for real discussion and learning among people who are thinkers, but more than thinkers.  We respond to ideas and thought, but we even talk about mathematical theories as “beautiful” or “elegant”, and those things move us and speak to us on a deeper level than we often express.

            In practical terms, some people learn through the sciences and some through the arts.  Some people learn visually and some learn by hearing; some learn by reading and some learn by moving.

            There have been times when Christianity has almost lost that awareness.  We grew out of Judaism, with its strong opposition to idolatry.

“You shall not make for yourself an idol, whether in the form of anything that is in heaven above or that is on the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth.  You shall not bow down to them or worship them…” [Exodus 20:4-5a]

Familiar?  I hope so.  At the same time, the tabernacle that Moses was commanded to construct and the Temple that later took its place were decorated with carvings of animals and embroidered hangings, so it isn’t all art that is banished.  At the Transfiguration, when Moses and Elijah appeared in conversation with Jesus, Peter’s impulse as a witness of that moment of pure glory was to offer to build three dwellings or tents or tabernacles (all possible translations of one word) to commemorate what had happened. [Luke 9:33]  Jesus turned it down, but the impulse to build a monument, to create, in response to this indescribable sight, was Peter’s very human thought.

            We face the need to see art for what it is, not worshiping it or making it an idol, but as a tool for communicating the awareness of a creative and redemptive God who does not disdain nor undervalue the material world or the people who live in it. 

            Yet, humans being humans, we do tend to worship our own creations.  At one point in Church history, there were a group of people who looked at the way images of Jesus and of God’s holy people were being treated and said, “Wait a minute.  This is going too far.”  A lot of people who had formerly been pagan still had superstitious ideas about statues and pictures and didn’t always distinguish clearly between the person pictured and the picture itself.  In Constantinople, there riots between “iconoclasts”, who favored banning images and sometimes took matters into their own hands, and “iconodules”, who insisted that they venerated images without worshiping them.  The battles went back and forth for over a century from 726-842.  Eventually, they settled on a compromise that you can still see in Orthodox icons, where they agreed not to produce three-dimensional statues, to avoid strictly realistic portrayals in favor of stylized figures, and to put them on gold backgrounds to symbolize that these icons are glimpses into heaven, not objects of power here on earth divorced from God’s Holy Spirit.

            The Italians perched across the water from Greece looked at this stuff and said, “Wait a minute.”  They didn’t have the same lofty, philosophical approach to art.  For them, as for much of Western Europe then and for the next few centuries, it was a way of teaching people who could not read and letting them get at least a small hint about the contents of the Bible.  They didn’t sign onto the program that Eastern Christianity adopted at that point. 

Now, that isn’t to say that Western Christianity hasn’t had its own excesses of devotion to statues from time to time, and its own arguments about what to do when images threaten to become idols.  On the whole, though, the tradition established by Italian painters of the Middle Ages and those who followed them over the centuries kept the visual arts alive as a means of teaching people about Jesus in a way that says he’s not just as a face staring down from above, but he is the living embodiment of God in human form.

            People like Giotto and Filippo Lippi and Cimabue (don’t worry – there won’t be a test) began to experiment with drawing and painting scenes from the life of Christ in realistic ways, setting them in Italian towns and with people wearing the clothing of their own day.  By painting Bible scenes that way, they were saying, “Don’t try to box Jesus in.”  They set an example of how to use artwork and everything else, for that matter, to set the gospel free in the world.  They pointed to the Transfiguration of Jesus, when the glory of God that lived within him burst out in a miraculous way because it is so wonderful that it just cannot be contained.

“And while he was praying, the appearance of his face changed, and his clothes became dazzling white.”  [Luke 9:2]

Jesus, for them, and for us, cannot be just an image even though we have an image of him in our minds sometimes or a set idea about him, when instead we are faced with a living Savior and the voice of God himself saying,

“This is my Son, my Chosen; listen to him!” [Luke 9:35]

Listen to him, because he has good news.  The kingdom of God is at hand, and he brings it to all of us, here and now.

“And the Word became flesh and lived among us, and we have seen his glory, the glory as of the Father’s only Son, full of grace and truth.” [John 1:14]

Saturday, February 23, 2019

"Congo: The Gift of Focus" - February 24, 2019




Matthew 25:31-46


            Jesus’ description of the Last Judgment has a bunch of clueless people standing before the throne of God asking what happened.  Some of them are being led by the angels into paradise and some of them are being herded in the opposite direction, and all of them – those who are blessed and those who are condemned – all say the same thing: “When did we see you, Lord?”

Neither group ever realized the deeper connection that underlies all human interactions.  None of them ever seems to have stopped to wonder whether when they dealt with someone bearing God’s image they might not also be dealing directly with God.  All the same, he was there, whether they knew it or not.  Some of them never realized it because they were too busy caring about themselves, so that they never had the time (or probably even the inclination) to look into anyone else’s eyes and see Jesus looking back.  Some of them never realized it because they were too busy trying to help the person in front of them – but for those people there is hope.

Of course, best of all is to be doing good because we do know that Christ is above all and in all and through all.  As Gerard Manley Hopkins wrote,

            “…Christ plays in ten thousand places,
            Lovely in limbs, and lovely in eyes not his
            To the Father through the features of men’s faces.”

Yet we learn that in the ugliest moments of human life.  We learn it where there is hunger and loneliness and fear and sickness.

            Central Africa and West Africa have been through terrible times in the past few decades.  Ethnic feuds have turned into civil wars and civil wars have sent refugees in all directions, destabilizing otherwise calm nations.  Criminals have taken advantage of the chaos, and the chaos has led normally law-abiding people to become criminals.  Add the occasional outbreak of ebola into the mix, and the friction between Christianity and Islam, and you have serious turmoil.

            In the midst of that, among all the horror stories, we keep hearing accounts of people who are doing things like building orphanages and schools, simply because there are children around who need to be taken care of.  No, not everyone reacts this way.  But some do.  We hear about doctors and nurses and ambulance drivers who cared for people desperately and dangerously sick, simply because the sick cannot take care of themselves.  We hear about people sharing their food and their houses with strangers on the run from war, just because they can see on their faces and in their eyes that there is a need that only time will change and they want to buy them the time if they can.  That is time for God to do the real work.

            It is a gift that the Christians of the Congo are able to focus on the needs of the people around them, needs both physical and spiritual.  It is a gift that they have been teaching specifically to us, and by “us” I mean United Methodist Christians in Eastern Pennsylvania, specifically those of us right here today.

            Every quarter, we take half the loose offering that is in the plate on Sunday morning and designate it for a mission project, local or national or global.  This quarter our giving, and all of the giving on Ash Wednesday, will go to help the eye clinic in Mpasa, Congo, and we are joined in that giving by the other churches in Delaware and Montgomery and Chester Counties that make up our South District.

            We’re going to watch a video that was put together to promote support for that work, but I don’t want anybody to watch it in that spirit this morning.  I want to watch it, instead, simply as a witness to what the Lord has done and what the Lord is doing at this very moment, in and through his people.
           

“Lord, when was it that we saw you hungry and gave you food, or thirsty and gave you something to drink? And when was it that we saw you a stranger and welcomed you, or naked and gave you clothing? And when was it that we saw you sick or in prison and visited you?” And the king will answer them, “Truly I tell you, just as you did it to one of the least of these who are members of my family, you did it to me.” [Matthew 25:37-40]

Saturday, February 16, 2019

"Peru: The Gift of Humility" - February 17, 2019




John 13:1-5, 12-16


            In 1611, a group of scholars presented King James I of England a fresh, new translation of the Bible.  He had ordered the work and paid for it, and it came with a dedication page that still appears at the start each reprint of the King James Version. 

“TO THE MOST HIGH AND MIGHTY PRINCE, JAMES, by the grace of God, KING OF GREAT BRITAIN, FRANCE, AND IRELAND, DEFENDER OF THE FAITH, etc. The Translators of the Bible wish Grace, Mercy, and Peace, through JESUS CHRIST our Lord.

Great and manifold were the blessings, most dread Sovereign, which Almighty God, the Father of all mercies, bestowed upon us the people of England, when he first sent Your Majesty’s Royal Person to rule and reign over us. [Then it talks about how worried they had been about what would happen when Queen Elizabeth died without a direct heir, but then] …the appearance of Your Majesty, as of the Sun in his strength, instantly dispelled those supposed and surmised mists, and gave unto all that were well affected exceeding cause of comfort; especially when we beheld in Your Highness, and Your hopeful Seed, by an undoubted Title, and this also accompanied with peace and tranquility at home and abroad.”

Is it any wonder that after a lifetime of being addressed this way, day in and day out, King James became the person who gave the world the phrase “the divine right of kings”?  Is it any wonder that the aristocrats who surrounded him and laid it on every bit as thick came to expect their own underlings to treat them in a similar way?  It was just how things were done, and not just in England.  There were places where it was even more extreme in that day, and one was Peru.

            Like the rest of Latin America at the time, Peru was organized into a rigid class system held together with slavery and racism.  So when in 1579, a former slave of African descent had a son named Martin by a Spanish noble who abandoned her and their children twelve years later. The family was desperately poor, but Martin was lucky to be apprenticed at one point to a barber (remember that in those days they were also the surgeons), so he had a skill to support himself, which he had to do by the age of ten.

            When he was fifteen, a monastery in Lima took him in as a servant, and they gave him the job of begging for the support of the monks’ work with the sick.  Apparently, he was very good at it.  He somehow managed to find enough regular support to provide for 160 people each week, usually with something left over, which was distributed to the poor.  Soon his medical skill as a barber came together with his efforts on behalf of the sick and he began to become known as a healer. 

Rather than make his fortune as a doctor, Martin felt that was his calling from God to stay among the Dominicans he was already working for and praying with, to carry on the work that he saw himself as part of, so he asked to be admitted as a lay member of the Dominicans.

            The answer was, “No.”  It was bad enough that he was poor.  It was worse that he was born out of wedlock.  Worst of all, though, Martin’s skin was dark.  He could work with them and for them, but he would never be one of them.  The Constitution of the Dominican order in Peru specifically said, “No black person may be received to the holy habit or profession of our order.”  Case closed. 

            The problem, though, was that God was doing amazing things through Martin de Porres.  His fundraising alone was impressive.  Then he went and founded an orphanage.  But he had an ability the rest of the Dominicans did not to evangelize among people who had no inclination to listen to the Spaniards living in the cloister.  Martin de Porres was able, perhaps because of his skin color, that his own father and the Church used as an excuse to look down on him, to minister directly to the physical and spiritual needs of slaves at the lowest end of the social ladder.  He did all this while still doing chores at the monastery, which is why you can see pictures and statues of him throughout Latin America that show him holding a broom.  In 1603, the monks could no longer not admit him, and they made Martin a lay brother in direct defiance of their own rules because he was clearly showing signs that the Holy Spirit was working through him.

            The gospels tell of a time that Jesus had broken the rules, too: those unwritten rules of conduct that the colonial Peruvians and the scholarly English translators shared.  By the way, we have our own version, that is so familiar we don’t pay attention to it.  It’s what tells us that we don’t have to be polite to someone who is only a waitress, or that the safety regulations that apply to a chemist in a lab aren’t important when it comes to the people on a production line working with the same compounds.  It’s what suggests which neighborhood can be sacrificed for a new stadium or where a new highway should be built.  It’s why we walk past someone sweeping the floor without even nodding.

The way that Jesus broke the rule was that he washed his disciples’ dirty feet instead of leaving it to a servant.  He made them all watch him do it, too.  And when he was done he said,

“‘Do you know what I have done to you? You call me Teacher and Lord—and you are right, for that is what I am. So if I, your Lord and Teacher, have washed your feet, you also ought to wash one another’s feet. For I have set you an example, that you also should do as I have done to you. Very truly, I tell you, servants are not greater than their master, nor are messengers greater than the one who sent them.”  [John 13:12-16]

When his followers have taken that to heart, like Martin de Porres, it has opened the doors to show a world where, say, a president might see no shame in putting his building skills to work at a Habitat site, doing carpentry like Jesus, so that someone who needs a home might have one.  It points to a world where somebody like Yo-yo Ma can perform a concert at an elementary school as well as Carnegie Hall, and where critics might decide that it’s okay to appreciate rhythm and blues alongside classical music.  It points to a world where being a gentleman or to be a lady is not a matter of birth, but of how someone treats other people.

            Humility is not humiliation – quite the opposite.  Humility carries a dignity sanctified by Jesus.  Humility points to the reign of God, where we are all children of the King.




Saturday, February 9, 2019

“China: The Gift of Courage” - February 10, 2019




I Peter 4:12-16


            There are places in the world where the persecution of Christians because they are Christians is either a fresh memory or a present reality.  What goes on in many of those places is beyond our current knowledge simply because the dangers require Christians to be secretive about their faith, which is nevertheless shared from person to person in quiet, direct witness.  Each time that happens it is an act of courage of a sort that the New Testament seems to expect.
There it is, in I Peter:

“Beloved, do not be surprised at the fiery ordeal that is taking place among you to test you, as though something strange were happening to you. But rejoice in so far as you are sharing Christ’s sufferings, so that you may also be glad and shout for joy when his glory is revealed. If you are reviled for the name of Christ, you are blessed, because the spirit of glory, which is the Spirit of God, is resting on you. But let none of you suffer as a murderer, a thief, a criminal, or even as a mischief-maker. Yet if any of you suffers as a Christian, do not consider it a disgrace, but glorify God because you bear this name.” [I Peter 4:12-16]

It is inevitable that Christian faith and the claims of false gods will collide.  We already have to fight against our own internal impulses to sin – which is why there are warnings not to give in to the impulses that can make someone “a murderer, a thief, a criminal, or even as a mischief-maker” – so it is no great stretch to see how external conflicts would arise with entire systems of life based on the principle that “might makes right”.  Those are a given.  What is variable with time and place is how threatened the powers that be find themselves, what means they use to combat the subversive teachings of Christ, and how his followers respond or hold up.

            Some regimes consider any sort of religion a threat.  When I was a kid, you would still hear people occasionally refer to “godless Communism”.  I would suggest that it wasn’t “godless”, but that its gods were false.  They had replaced the kingdom of God with the state and pictured Lenin or Mao or Kim Il Sung or Fidel Castro as the savior.  The Chinese government has been going after Tibetan Buddhism for five decades or so now, and has recently built “re-education centers” to try to wring Islam out of the Uighurs in their western provinces.  And they have continued over that whole time, too, to try to control Christianity in places where they have discovered that they cannot eliminate it.

            Let me quote here from a recent article published by the Council on Foreign Relations:

“Article 36 of the Chinese constitution protects freedom of religion. Yet that protection is limited to so-called ‘normal religious activities,’ explicitly stating that ‘no one may make use of religion to engage in activities that disrupt public order, impair the health of citizens or interfere with the education system of the state.’ These provisions provide authorities with flexibility when determining which religious practices are consistent with party policy and which fall outside the party-state’s guidelines. The constitutional provision goes on to specify that religious bodies cannot be subject to foreign control.  [Translation: ‘Hey, Vatican!  Stay out of this!’]

Underground house churches exist parallel to state-sanctioned Christian churches. These congregations operate outside the guidelines of the government, and their regulation by party authorities is largely determined by local leaders. Much like official Christian organizations, their membership is also growing across regions and demographics, according to surveys by independent polling groups. Fenggang Yang, of Purdue University’s Center on Religion and Chinese Society, estimates that there are between 93 million and 115 million Protestants in China, with fewer than 30 million attending officially registered churches. Other Christian organizations estimate a higher number still.”[1]

As a result of the growth, the government has recently been pushing back.

“For example, party officials in the eastern coastal province of Zhejiang’s city of Wenzhou, known for its large Christian population, have ordered the removal of hundreds of crosses and demolition of dozens of churches that allegedly violated construction regulations, though several had received prior approval from local officials. … In central Henan Province, local government and police officials have taken similar actions, carrying out raids on some churches without warrants and razing others. Other provinces with large Christian populations, including Anhui and Jiangsu, have also undergone crackdowns.”

            Hear again the words of I Peter and ask how Christians in China would hear them.

“Beloved, do not be surprised at the fiery ordeal that is taking place among you to test you, as though something strange were happening to you. But rejoice in so far as you are sharing Christ’s sufferings, so that you may also be glad and shout for joy when his glory is revealed. If you are reviled for the name of Christ, you are blessed, because the spirit of glory, which is the Spirit of God, is latent on you.”

That the Spirit of God rests on them is clear in the way that this suffering part of the church is nevertheless the lifeline for believers in North Korea, who undergo far worse trials even than they do.  An article from the Associated Press claims that

“Most remaining Christians in North Korea likely learned about the religion when they went to China after a devastating famine killed hundreds of thousands in the mid-1990s.  Converts were later captured in China and jailed once they were sent back to the North.”[2]

What happens there in those jails?  We can only imagine, and most of it is not good at all.  But we also get glimpses of what kind of sacrifice and courage the Christians of China are teaching the Christians of North Korea.  In the middle of this famine,

“Another, who was jailed after being repatriated from China, described praying silently in his cell after a hungry fellow prisoner shared some precious kernels of corn.”

Surely, this deed fulfills the directions of I Peter [4:19]:

“Therefore, let those who are suffering in accordance with God’s will entrust themselves to a faithful Creator, while continuing to do good.”

            It also puts some of the times I find myself complaining or groaning into an entirely different perspective.



[1] Eleanor Albert, “Backgrounder: Christianity in China” (Council on Foreign Relations: October 11, 2018), found at https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/christianity-china
[2] Hyun-Jin Kim, “North Korean Christians Keep Faith Underground amid Crackdowns” (Associated Press: February 1, 2019), found at  https://www.apnews.com/a7079dea595349928d26c687fa42a19c

Saturday, February 2, 2019

“Greece: The Gift of Study” - February 3, 2019




II Timothy 3:14-17


            Until very recently, literacy has been a rare thing.  According to the U.N., in 2015 the global literacy rate among adults was 86.3%.  In 1970, that was only around 67%, and if you push back to the year 1500, in England only about 10% of men and 2% of women could read.  That seems to have been about the same overall level as in the Roman Empire, although the fact that Roman ruins often show graffiti suggests that the ability to read was spread across classes, like any other skill.  After all, if you can afford a slave to read to you, why waste the time learning to do it yourself?

            But there were scattered groups for whom reading was important on a level that lifted it above other abilities.  One of those was the Jews.  They had, like everybody else, their own alphabet and their own way of writing.  It had developed, as other writing had developed in the Middle East, for religious purposes.  Eventually, when successive empires sent them into exile, they took their writings with them and they eventually translated some of them into the common Greek language that was used all over the Mediterranean world.

            It was that version of the collected books that we now call the Old Testament or the Hebrew Scriptures, in a Greek translation, that one Jewish convert to Christianity named Paul, born in the Roman city of Tarsus in what is now Turkey, recommended to a younger Jewish follower named Timothy, born and raised in a similar background.  For the Greeks and Romans and others, to be able to read was useful.  For Paul, it was a tool to reach out to God, and to be transformed. 

“But as for you, continue in what you have learned and firmly believed, knowing from whom you learned it, and how from childhood you have known the sacred writings that are able to instruct you for salvation through faith in Christ Jesus.”
                                    [II Timothy 3:14-15]

What you can learn from that book, he was saying, can open your mind and prepare you for an encounter with Jesus that will change you for good.  That doesn’t rule out those who cannot read, but if you can read, and have this library of books on hand, you have a head start.

            Not every book is the same, and they don’t all serve the same purpose.  There are legends and there are histories.  There are love poems and there are war chants.  There are lists of people’s ancestors and there are instructions for priests working at a temple that was destroyed long ago.  There are ethical instructions and there are stories about some exceedingly unethical people.  There are declarations of despair and prayers of thanksgiving or expressions of hope.  But when you take them all together, and let them sort of stew together inside you over time, they form a rich nourishment for human life lived in the presence of God himself.

“All scripture is inspired by God and is useful for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness, so that everyone who belongs to God may be proficient, equipped for every good work.” [II Timothy 3:16-17]

It’s one of those rich ironies of God that the letter where Paul said that, along with a lot of other writings being set down around the same time, give or take a generation, would themselves come to be considered in the same way and treated with the same respect.

            The strong intellectual tradition of Greece came to mingle with that originally Jewish tradition of honoring the scriptures to create the whole stream of Christian theology.  A thousand years later, an Italian living in England, Anselm of Canterbury, said that theology is “faith seeking understanding”, and it was Christians living in that Greek culture who had set the early example.  Start with faith.  Start with the living experience of the living Savior, then use all your mind’s resources to understand his love.  You’ll never entirely succeed, but the effort itself is part of getting to know him and keeping the relationship fresh and exciting. 

The Greeks who played a large part in the earliest centuries of the Church’s life knew how to do that.  The Creeds that we still honor are their efforts to put into words the mystery of God’s being, and to explain how it is that he has come to us in Jesus, and acts among us in the Holy Spirit.  They hashed them out through long and sometimes heated controversies, always coming back to the scriptures to test what they were saying, those scriptures being

“the sacred writings that are able to instruct you for salvation through faith in Christ Jesus.” [II Timothy 3:15]

            Studying the Bible is a discipline that keeps our encounters with God in daily life alive. Real study isn’t trying to pile up facts or sound learned.  Real study is honest evaluation of ourselves and our world in a way that keeps us from living entirely in our heads or entirely in our emotions.  The Bible deals with complex humans and a complex God in a balanced and complete way, and forces us to do the same thing.  A theologian trained in philosophical technicalities might warn us not to put God into a box by saying:

“the ambiguity of religion shows its effect on these processes of reductive profanization, just as it shows its effect in the center of religious self-transcendence.”[1]

But if you want to remember that point, if you want to learn humility before the Lord, you go to Isaiah [55:8-9]:

“For my thoughts are not your thoughts,
            nor are your ways my ways, says the Lord.
For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
            so are my ways higher than your ways
            and my thoughts than your thoughts.”

Even Jesus, when tempted to misuse his power, turned to what Deuteronomy had said about finding guidance beyond ourselves.  In a moment of both spiritual and physical vulnerability, he remembered,

“It is written,
‘One does not live by bread alone,
           but by every word that comes from the mouth of God.’”
                                   [Matthew 4:4]

We should do as well.  We, who are blessed to be able to read those words, should know them.
           
So, said a first-century evangelist educated both in Greece and in Jerusalem:

“as for you, continue in what you have learned and firmly believed, knowing from whom you learned it, and how from childhood you have known the sacred writings that are able to instruct you for salvation through faith in Christ Jesus.”
                                                            [II Timothy 3:14-15]



[1] Paul Tillich, Systematic Theology (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1967), 101.

Saturday, January 26, 2019

“Canada: The Gift of Unity” - January 27, 2019




John 17:1-11


            For better or worse, the Christian Church is a family, with God as our universal Parent, with attributes we see in earthly parents – both mothers and fathers; with Jesus as the older brother into whose care God has placed us; and with the rest of us as a huge number of brothers and sisters that he sometimes has to help and sometimes has to manage and sometimes has to keep in line, but whom he always loves.  He loves us for the sake of his Father and for our own sake. 

            You can hear that love in the prayer that John says Jesus offered on the night that he was betrayed.  Jesus knew that he had needed divine help to fulfill his purpose, and that it was his unity with the Father that had sustained him and would see him through his suffering.  He prayed for them, for us:

“I am asking on their behalf; I am not asking on behalf of the world, but on behalf of those whom you gave me, because they are yours. All mine are yours, and yours are mine; and I have been glorified in them. And now I am no longer in the world, but they are in the world, and I am coming to you. Holy Father, protect them in your name that you have given me, so that they may be one, as we are one.”  [John 17:9-11]

Jesus knew that the disciples would face terrible trials, and although they, like him, would be brought to know God’s full glory through their troubles, they did not know that, at least not yet.  To get to that point, they needed to be in clear solidarity with God and with one another. 

Mind you, he was praying for a group that was not unified around everything.  Matthew had been a tax collector, with a record of working with the Romans.  Simon the Zealot had been part of a group dedicated to driving the Romans out of Judea by any means necessary.  There are stories in the gospels about how James and John alienated the others by bragging.  I won’t go into how people looked on some of the women that Jesus allowed or invited to hang out with them.  What held them together wasn’t ultimately their close ties of friendship, but their focus on and love for Jesus.  He was at the center of things, and as long as he stayed there, they would hold together. 

            We haven’t always done a great job of keeping our eyes on Jesus, though.  We’ve let a lot of things divide us up into our separate groups.  I say that as someone who, like any clergyperson of any stripe, has a vested interest in maintaining that certain beliefs and certain ways of doing things are the right beliefs and the right practices.  I am not Eastern Orthodox: I think it is downright harmful when people are expected to worship in a language that they do not understand.  I am not Roman Catholic: I do not think the clergy have an exclusive right to pronounce absolution of sins, but that all Christians are obligated to announce that pardon and forgiveness are the free gift of Christ to all who simply and sincerely turn to him.  I am not a Baptist: I believe that God’s grace is given without respect to our ability to understand what’s going on.  I am not a Calvinist: I do not believe Jesus’ atonement for our sins is limited to those whom God knew ahead of time would take the offer, and I do believe that God’s grace is out there waiting for us, preparing us to respond freely when we do take him up on a new life.

            I am not, however, prepared to say that anyone who loves Jesus is outside his embrace, and pray not to be separated from anyone whom Jesus calls his own.  That has been, in fact, one of those identifiers of the Methodist movements from the early days when John Wesley, a priest of the Church of England to the end of his life, was learning about faith from the Moravians and translating the hymns of German Lutherans into English and studying the Greek Fathers.[1]  You do not have to give up the particulars of your own belief and practice to honor the profound faith that is in other traditions.  So Wesley wrote of one whose spirit is open to the catholic, that is the “universal”, presence of Jesus:

“while he is steadily fixed in his religious principles in what he believes to be the truth as it is in Jesus; while he firmly adheres to that worship of God which he judges to be most acceptable in his sight; and while he is united by the tenderest and closest ties to one particular congregation, --his heart is enlarged toward all mankind, those he knows and those he does not; he embraces with strong and cordial affection neighbours and strangers, friends and enemies. This is catholic or universal love. And he that has this is of a catholic spirit. For love alone gives the title to this character: catholic love is a catholic spirit.”[2]

Despite all of our divisions, the Church at its best has always held onto this sense of unity that is not necessarily external and administrative, but a unity of heart centered on Jesus and his love.

            That reality is experienced from within the family of faith.  There are glimpses of it wherever Christians of different persuasions work and worship together.  It’s present when we hold our community Lenten services or serve meals together at St. Peter’s.  It’s there when the weather becomes dangerously cold and a Code Blue is called, so that volunteers from many churches head over to Sacred Heart to open the doors to the homeless.  It’s there when the Clinic offers medical care, or when Meals on Wheels delivers a lunch.  It’s what happens when I go away for a day or two and I call Doug Hagler from First Presbyterian and say, “Could you be on call if there are any emergencies?” or when David Bryant asks Jillian Miller to play because he’s sick.  It’s there when our youth and the confirmation class from St. John’s Lutheran pray together about gun violence, or when Sister St. Joseph speaks about Francis of Assisi at the blessing of the animals.  It’s beautiful to behold.

            Unfortunately, it’s not always what the world sees.  And that is why, as we celebrate during Epiphany the gifts offered by the Christians of different nations, today we give thanks for a gift from Canada.  In 1925, almost a century ago, Canadian Methodists, Presbyterians, and Congregationalists came together to form the United Church of Canada (and, for the record, when the United Methodist Church formed south of the border in 1968, the Evangelical United Brethren who were in Canada joined them at that point).  They did it out of conviction that the world needed to see their internal unity in an external fashion.  They put the motto on their new seal: “Ut omnes unum sint”, Latin for “that they may all be one”, which was Jesus’ prayer for the disciples:

“Holy Father, protect them in your name that you have given me, so that they may be one, as we are one.” [John 17:11]
In their foundational documents, they express their purpose in joining together as being a declaration of unity to the world at large.  They said:

“We acknowledge one Holy Catholic Church, the innumerable company of saints of every age and nation, who being united by the Holy Spirit to Christ their Head are one body in Him and have communion with their Lord and with one another. Further, we receive it as the will of Christ that His Church on earth should exist as a visible and sacred brotherhood, consisting of those who profess faith in Jesus Christ and obedience to Him, together with their children and other baptized children, and organized for the confession of His name, for the public worship of God, for the administration of the sacraments, for the upbuilding of the saints, and for the universal propagation of the Gospel; and we acknowledge as a part, more or less pure, of this universal brotherhood, every particular church throughout the world which professes this faith in Jesus Christ and obedience to Him as divine Lord and Saviour.”[3]
It was a way of bringing to the external sight of the world the internal vision that Jesus set forth for them, and for us.

            So it is that, for the occasion of their union, William Merrill wrote a hymn that we also sing sometimes, and that we will sing in a moment.  It says,

“Not alone for mighty empire,
Stretching far o’er land and sea,
Not alone for bounteous harvests,
Lift we up our hearts to thee:             
Standing in the living present,
Memory and hope between,
Lord, we would with deep thanksgiving
Praise thee most for things unseen.”



[1] See Ted Campbell, “Wesley’s Use of the Church Fathers” at https://place.asburyseminary.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://search.yahoo.com/&httpsredir=1&article=1364&context=asburyjournal
[2] John Wesley, Sermon 39: “Catholic Spirit” at https://www.umcmission.org/Find-Resources/John-Wesley-Sermons/Sermon-39-Catholic-Spirit
[3] “Doctrine: Article 15 ‘Of the Church’” in The Manual, 35th Edition (United Church of Canada Publishing House, 2010). Found at  https://commons.united-church.ca/Documents/Governance/General%20Council/40th%20General%20Council%20(2009)/The%20Manual%202010.pdf