Luke
7:36-8:3
Simon
the Pharisee may have thought he was pulling off some sort of social triumph by
having Jesus to dinner at his house.
There are always people who enjoy being surrounded by celebrities, as if
some of their fame will rub off. It also
gives an opportunity to namedrop. As I
said to Oprah the other day, “I get so tired of the paparazzi breaking down the
rhododendrons…” Or maybe Simon was
genuinely offering hospitality to a traveling rabbi and his disciples; Jesus
and the Pharisees had a lot more in common than we sometimes would think from
the gospels. The problem, either way,
was that Jesus traveled with an entourage, and Simon wasn’t quite sure how to
handle some of his followers.
Some of them
were an embarrassment. That hasn’t
changed. There are some religious people
who are considered socially acceptable and some who aren’t, even apart from
their beliefs. It would be a major life
experience if the Dalai Lama dropped in for a visit, or if Desmond Tutu stuck
his head in. I disagree with a lot of
what Jerry Falwell said, but I will long remember introducing him when he gave
a speech. But there are a lot more folks
who will never achieve that kind of status.
There are the ones whose trunks are completely plastered with
bumperstickers. There are the ones who answer
the phone, “Praise the Lord!” There are
those that are going to offer to pray for you when you have a headache instead
of offering to get you an aspirin. Put
people like that into some kind of social event and who knows what might
happen?
In the
old Marx Brothers movies, there’s the society hostess, Margaret Dumont, that
Groucho loves to embarrass. He walks up
to her and starts to comment on everything and everyone around them and she
stands there twisting her necklace and looking scared, like she’s trying to
find the most polite way to tell him to leave.
Or what
about the scene that Garth Brooks describes in his most famous song:
“Blame it all on my roots, I showed up
in boots
And ruined your black tie affair
The last one to show, the last one to know
The last one you thought you'd see there
I saw the surprise, and the fear in his eyes
When I took his glass of champagne
Then I toasted you, said honey we may be through
But you'll never hear me complain.”
And ruined your black tie affair
The last one to show, the last one to know
The last one you thought you'd see there
I saw the surprise, and the fear in his eyes
When I took his glass of champagne
Then I toasted you, said honey we may be through
But you'll never hear me complain.”
In Simon the Pharisee’s house, the
interloper was “a woman in the city, who was a sinner”. [Luke
7:37] Isn’t that a great euphemism? No need to go any further than that. We know all about her. We don’t need to know any more, and she has
found her way into the dinner party. In
contrast, over there are Jesus’ respectable friends, including
“some
women who had been cured of evil spirits and infirmities: Mary, called
Magdalene, from whom seven demons had gone out, and Joanna, the wife of
Herod’s steward Chuza, and Susanna, and many others, who provided for
them out of their resources.” [Luke 8:2-3]
The
new addition doesn’t quite fit into their category, however. She has money enough to buy expensive items,
and we won’t ask too much where it comes from, but no sense of the scene she’s
making as,
“having
learned that he was eating in the Pharisee’s house, [she] brought an alabaster
jar of ointment. She stood behind him at his feet, weeping, and began to
bathe his feet with her tears and to dry them with her hair. Then she continued
kissing his feet and anointing them with the ointment.” [Luke 7:37-38]
Who does something
like that? And who takes them seriously?
Jesus had the answer
to the question that Simon didn’t want to raise, but that kept going through
his head: “Doesn’t Jesus know who this woman is? Can’t he see?
How can he let her touch him, as if he were one of her clients?” Jesus didn’t even wait to let him speak the
question. He knew what he was thinking,
and he addressed it in a way that started out politely enough.
“Jesus
spoke up and said to him, ‘Simon, I have something to say to you.’ ‘Teacher,’
he replied, ‘speak.’ ‘A certain creditor had two debtors; one owed five
hundred denarii, and the other fifty. When they could not pay, he
cancelled the debts for both of them. Now which of them will love him
more?’ Simon answered, ‘I suppose the one for whom he cancelled the
greater debt.’ And Jesus said to him, ‘You have judged rightly.’” [Luke 7:40-43]
I can imagine Simon
thinking, “Okay, okay, I get it,” because he clearly did get it. We all get it. The major sinner will repent in a big
way. Michael Vick will stop betting on
dogfights and will sponsor animal shelters.
Watergate conspirator Charles Colson will go to jail and when he gets
out will start Prison Fellowship International.
That’s how these things are done.
Jesus gets a little personal about
it, though, at least with Simon.
“Then
turning towards the woman, he said to Simon, ‘Do you see this woman? I entered
your house; you gave me no water for my feet, but she has bathed my feet with
her tears and dried them with her hair. You gave me no kiss, but from the
time I came in she has not stopped kissing my feet. You did not anoint my head with
oil, but she has anointed my feet with ointment. Therefore, I tell you,
her sins, which were many, have been forgiven; hence she has shown great love.
But the one to whom little is forgiven, loves little.’” [Luke 7:44-47]
Her
sins were obvious, even to her. Simon’s
sins were not even obvious to himself, and that led to an even bigger flaw,
which was the failure to love. Ouch.
When you have most things together,
it’s easy to pretend you have everything together. It’s easy to forget that there’s really no
difference between a train that goes six inches off the track or one that goes
six feet off the track. Either way there
is a derailment and somebody is going to get hurt. Big sinners or little sinners – we need God’s
mercy, either way. There are sins of
commission – things that we do; and there are also sins of omission – things
that we should do but forget or neglect or put off. We need God’s mercy, either way. And either way, God offers that mercy to us. That’s the good news.
And either way, God asks us to be
merciful to one another. That’s the
challenge that comes with it. Give Simon
the Pharisee some credit. He didn’t have
the woman thrown out, and he listened to what Jesus had to say, both about her
and about himself. And, once again, the
gospel doesn’t tell us what he did after this or how he responded – which
frustrates me, because I feel like I want everything wrapped up, preferably
with a happy ending to the episode where they all become lifelong friends and
followers of Jesus. But the point isn’t
really how Simon responded. The point is
to ask how you and I will respond when we are in similar spots.
Do we learn how to love or don’t
we? We get to write that part ourselves
– with God’s help.
No comments:
Post a Comment